In my blog stats, the term most commonly searched for (that links to my site) is ’size zero’ or a variation of that. Loads of people searching for ’size zero’ every day. I’m really curious who these people are and why they are searching for ’size zero’. Is it girls who want to be size zero? Is it guys who fancy size zero girls? Is it people interested in looking at skinny celebritites?
So, if you search for ’size zero’ and found this site, could you please satisfy my curiousity and let me know why?
Here’s a picture of Louise before and after she lost 11lbs in 30 days to become a size zero for a TV programme.
May 13, 2008 at 8:49 pm |
im not one of the size zero searchers BUT id totally prefer to ‘tap’ the one on the left, shes like the perfect size and healthy. the one on the right looks vulnerable and malnurished.
May 13, 2008 at 10:45 pm |
Yeh, she’s definitely more attractive in the picture on the left but I think if she was tanned and standing in the more provocative pose with nice hair, she’s probably be just as nice in the right pic.
May 14, 2008 at 12:32 pm |
Size zero does nothing for me whatsoever
Women should have a figure, that figure not being ‘0′
I mean, you’ve got nothing to hold onto !
May 14, 2008 at 4:10 pm |
BigFatJim Says:
May 14, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Size zero does nothing for me whatsoever
Women should have a figure, that figure not being ‘0′
I mean, you’ve got nothing to hold onto !
Haha u can hold onto the grooves inbetween her rib bones
May 15, 2008 at 10:12 am |
There’s plenty to hold onto, her neck…
May 17, 2008 at 4:50 pm |
I prefer one on the left.
I dunno, maybe it’s because she has bigger boobs. Either way, too skinny = NOT NICE.
May 17, 2008 at 5:33 pm |
wow thats amazing.
May 18, 2008 at 1:14 pm |
after all these years she would still definitely get it!
May 18, 2008 at 1:18 pm |
you pals got married in the same place as me, pollokshields burgh halls. Cracking place for a bit of a do!
May 19, 2008 at 7:20 pm |
yes eddiemunster, it was very nice and chilled out, I especially liked wandering around the park with my champage.
May 19, 2008 at 11:18 pm |
If she @ the left picture had added some more suitable clothes that had fit her size O then i think it would been a better picture.. even I agree with the rest that the picture to the left is the best, she looks more healthier. Been there myself (was too skinny earlier), but now it feels better to have some extra more kilo on my body, so all my love and praise to the one and only who told me that i needed to be some kilo heavier
May 20, 2008 at 1:34 am |
im sooo bloody wasted, but i thot i shud comment, im going away tomorrow to eastern europe. if i dont comment in about a month. im DEFINITELY dead. like good an proper lying in a ditch, lifeless, dead.
May 23, 2008 at 11:11 am |
The pics are clearly made so that she is less attractive in the skinnier one. Size zero isn’t even a big deal for her, it’s like a UK size 4 I think which is pretty much fine when you’re aout 5′ tall like her, it’s only when you get 5′10″ models trying to be that size that you get a skeletor type creature…
June 1, 2008 at 6:44 pm |
I totally agree with Johnifer.
And the pic on the left has better lighting, she has a nicer hairstyle, a more provocative pose, just like lynnmcg said.
Why do t.v programmes do that tho? Documentaries should be as unbiased as possible, there should be no pre-judged right or wrong.
Well actually, just as I was typing that I do disagree with myself. Because vulnerable males and females watching that might be tempted in to being a size zero and so we must not possibly create any likelihood of that happening. But still…how obivous is it that the left picture is just so much better?
You know, on the other hand, and a completley different take on this argument, I would like to point out that I am naturally a size 8. I eat loads aswell. And I would LOVE a ‘womanly’ figure aka Marilyn Monroe, who was a size 16. And then you get all these programmes saying campaign for real woman, fuller figures are the more attractive, nobody wants a skinny malinky. And you get overweight girls looking at you with jealousy or saying ‘god, youre so lucky’ and if I even try to say I feel fat that day its a “WHAAAAAT??”
You know, fuller figure females should jsut shut the fuck up complaining because put it this way, jsut cause u aint got a size zero waist line and pins to die for you can just put on a low cut top and a push up bra and show off your cleavage…Something skinny girls cant do so well.
Size zero isnt bad if thats what youre meant to be.
And she doesnt look that bad, even with the obvious attempts to make her look worse. Thats what I look like. And what, am I not attractive? (thats a rhetorical q)
June 13, 2008 at 3:22 pm |
definately hotter on the left
June 17, 2008 at 12:14 am |
the pic on the left is closer than the one on the right, that’s why she looks bigger, and her hair’s down and her arms are closer to her body, you’ve all been duped!
oh and lynn, thought i’d pop over and see what you do here as Brian’s gone all political and is talking about being 21 to buy booze n stuff… boring.
June 17, 2008 at 4:41 am |
aye, but is that because her baps look bigger ?
June 17, 2008 at 7:00 am |
The baps and the tan.
Welcome Gee.
June 19, 2008 at 8:07 pm |
i reckon that although she looks nice and healthy, with a good rack etc, everyone’s right about the pic being a setup. in her skinnier form, although probably not as bad as it looks, her baps would get stretch marked and saggy….never a good look. this is important.
July 3, 2008 at 6:43 pm |
Freddo hasn’t commented in over a month. Does that mean that he’s lying lifeless somewhere in Eastern Europe? Does anybody care?
July 23, 2008 at 6:43 pm |
all the guys are sayin she’s nicer on the left because they know there are probably more girls that look like that around and hope that when they find out about their curvy tastes they will have sex with them. i do believe most men would fuck em either way.